Sspx controversy

Comments

I just learned today that the Resistance splinter group, under Bishop Williamson, has indeed consecrated three more bishops. Does this mean the Resistance will continue into future generations while the mainstream SSPX will not?

Just curious. How precious. As a Western Catholic, I find it ridiculous too. There are much deeper issues. I just assume the remaining parishioners will drift into the FSSP as the clerics retire.

Society of Saint Pius X

As a result, I thought he was not included in the lifting of the excommunications with the others. No, I specifically remember that his excommunication was lifted, because it was a big scandal in the papers when he started spouting Holocaust denial rubbish AFTER the Pope Emeritus lifted the excommunications. The Resistance was formed at some point after that whole episode.

So, my question remains…was he and the bishops he consecrated excommunicated? I remember it was at about the same time. I guess I got the order backwards. I think that means he is re-excommunicated, because illicit ordination of a bishop is one of those automatic deals, as I recall. However, Williamson again incurred a latae setentiae excommunication in March of when he consecrated another bishop without a papal mandate, so even if he did recently ordain more, he was already excommunicated.

While it would be great if the SSPX were to merge with one of those societies, or better yet, return to full canonical standing, I believe that your doubt about their current state of existence is a little off. Attendance at their chapels is by all accounts growing substantially, and they recently had to build a new seminary in Virginia.

But unless they take the path of the Resistance and consecrate new bishops, they will die… not as a matter of choice… nature will take its course. They have three choices: fully reconcile with Rome, go into full schism, or die.

I have heard for a decade or more that they are growing, etc, etc. But that never seems to come to pass. Both Benedict and Francis have basically said that they all is forgiven if they only just admit that the Pope is valid and so is Vatican II. If they refuse to admit the validity of the Pope and an Ecumenical Council, I do not see how they can be fully regularized.

Any good lawyer will tell you that before you sign an agreement, both sides must agree on the definition of the terms used in the agreement. Example: Tradition.

Dialogue between the Vatican and the SSPX

The documents of VII have to be read in the light of the councils before it. Bishops who are already consecrated may chose to join them. There are however priests who switched to the SSPX at some point during their careers.Can somebody couch it in simple terms?

On highly controversial matters is is wise to be very meticulous and thorough in backing up one's statements.

sspx controversy

In this posting, if readers will be indulgent, I'll just set down what I understand of the situation. I will work at providing links. I hope I don't misrepresent anybody. Vatican II closed in There were changes in every aspect of Catholic life, including progressive changes to the Latin Mass about every 2 years from until the Novus Ordo Missae was imposed in Now there are two views about what happened next.

As far as I know, nobody who is informed will dispute the following facts:. He was told to follow the new orientations.

He continued to refuse. Matters simmered along until when he consecrated 4 bishops against the specific command of Pope John Paul II.

The following day he was excommunicated, but continued to function as before. At this point about a dozen of his priests left the Fraternity the SSPXwent to Rome, and asked to be given a canonical place in the Church that would be in good standing.

The Fraternity of S. At first none of the SSPX bishops were in charge but after some years Bp Fellay was elected superior General, a position he holds to the present day. Matters continue in this situation. Recently one of the four SSPX bishops, Bp Williamson, was either expelled or resigned from the Fraternity, and is now a 'vagus' or prelate with no canonical place in the hierarchy, although he is still a validly-consecrated bishop.

I will now state, as simply and as concisely as possible, what I understand of the 'trad' position - although I do not claim any authority to speak for anybody else. In a word, the crisis is being perpetuated in part by a confusion about the dogmas of the Faith, compounded by a misunderstanding of the scope, meaning and limits of Obedience. The Faithful are being asked to abandon essential bastions of the Faith in the name of Obedience, a situation which cannot be permitted.This was repeated a second time, and I did the same thing.

But while I was holding the host in my hand, I felt such a power of love that for the rest of the day I could neither eat nor come to my senses. I heard these words from the host: I desired to rest in your handsnot only in your heart.

For your sake I bless the world. On pagewe read that Sr. Andrew Bobola, my soul was instantly filled with a great longing that our congregation, too, might have a saint and I wept like a child that there was no saint in our midst. You are that saint.

From her will come forth the spark that will prepare the world for My final coming. You are a great and all-powerful Lord; you can grant me this favor.

Sas orminas de sa limba nostra

You will recite it for nine days, on the beads of the Rosaryin the following manner: First of all, you will say one Our Father and Hail Mary and the I Believe in God. The above statements present a number of problems.

Rabbi Speaks on SSPX/Pope Benedict Controversy

The first problem is the promotion of Communion in the hand, which is supposedly endorsed by Our Lord. The Host flies into her hand numerous times, and Our Lord supposedly says that He desires to rest in her hands.

I believe this is a diabolical snare to get Communion in the hand accepted in advance of the Vatican II religion. Second, we see unnecessary praise heaped upon this sister. Our Lord could have told the superior such a thing if he wanted it known. Third, we see that Sr. Since we know that John Paul II was an apostate, non-Catholic antipope, who literally preached the doctrine of antichrist in the Vatican while endorsing the false religions of the world, this shows us again that Sr.

Fourth, the Divine Mercy Devotion is centered around mercy at a time when mankind was coming closer and closer to having filled up the cup of divine justice. They needed to hear about His justice. Fifth, and perhaps most importantly, would God reveal a new devotion to be said on the beads of the Rosary shortly after His Mother came to Fatima to work a profound miracle to reveal, among other things, the necessity of the Rosary? All these things considered, the Divine Mercy Devotion is something which should be avoided by Catholics.

Catholics should say an extra rosary or the Stations of the Cross instead. It was rehabilitated around the world by John Paul II. By Bro. Michael Dimond, O. Our YouTube Channel. Help Save Souls. Apocalypse Now In The Vatican. The Antichrist Identified! Why Hell Must Be Eternal. Babylon Has Fallen, Fallen!!The Society of St. Pius X SSPX is an international traditionalist Catholic organization which defines its mission as opposing innovation and modernity within the Catholic Church.

Although its main focus has always been the preservation of the Latin Mass as a viable form of worship, SSPX has promoted theological and conspiratorial anti-Semitism among its adherents. In sermons, writings, Web sites and publications, SSPX representatives have charged contemporary Jews with deicide, have endorsed the Protocols of the Elders of Zionand have claimed that there is factual basis for the Blood Libel. One of its bishops has also denied the Holocaust. These reforms included the substitution of a vernacular Mass for the traditional Latin Mass and a new emphasis on interfaith dialogue.

In SSPX's founder, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, consecrated four priests as bishops without Vatican approval; he and the priests were consequently excommunicated by the Church. When Lefebvre died in the four priests, Bernard Fellay, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, Richard Williamson and Alfonso de Galarreta, continued to champion SSPX positions, along with a constellation of like-minded organizations and independent traditionalist Catholics.

sspx controversy

Its U. It also maintains a Web site. Pius X is mired in anti-Semitism, which it disseminates through its Web sites and publications. Jews are accused of being in control of world financial and cultural institutions and of plotting to create a "world empire" or obtain "world dominion. Web site goes so far as to accuse Jews of ritual murder of Christians and charges that "International Judaism" engineered usury and capitalism in order to bilk Christians of their money.

SSPX writers also encourage their adherents to avoid "enter[ing] into commercial, social, [or] political relations" with Jews and argue that Jews should not be granted the same civic rights as Christians.

Dymo labelwriter 450 label orientation

Williamson is a conspiracy theorist who has charged the United States government with engineering the September 11, attacks on the World Trade Center in New York. For decades, Williamson has also promoted anti-Semitic beliefs and Holocaust denial. Williamson has issued several high profile endorsements of Holocaust denial, most recently in an interview on Swedish television aired in January in which he claimed that "there were no gas chambers" during the Holocaust.

In a speech at a Canadian church, he declared that "there was not one Jew killed in the gas chambers. It was all lies, lies, lies. The Jews created the Holocaust so we would prostrate ourselves on our knees before them and approve of their new State of Israel.

Williamson has also made statements in support of Ernst Zundela white supremacist and Holocaust denier who has been jailed in Canada and Germany for Holocaust denial and inciting racial hatred. Williamson also appears to be an associate of Holocaust denier David Irvinghaving attended a reception at his home in Octoberaccording to a post on Irving's Web site.

He also refused to visit the site of the Auschwitz extermination camp. It is too early to say whether the removal of these articles reflects merely a cosmetic change in response to outside inquiry or a fundamental shift in SSPX teachings about Judaism. The devil will not fail to make use of their blindness to foist the Antichrist upon them. Christ, whom they have rejected, is the Truth. Thus the curse of St. It is no longer Isaac, but Ishmael. No longer Jacob, but Esau. No longer Abel, but Cain.

The Jewish people, if it has not converted to Christianity, will, even if it does not wish to, seek to ruin Christianity… Christendom and Jewry are destined inevitably to meet everywhere without reconciliation or mixing.

Zojirushi rice cooker reset

It represents in history the eternal struggle of Lucifer against God, of darkness against the Light, of the flesh against the spirit. This theological law is stronger than all human plans and expedients. The Jewish people realizes this law. The law contained in the Talmud, which governs Jews, orders enmity with Christians…. The Talmud got particularly virulent after Christianity appeared.Over the past couple of months, unrest has been growing in traditional circles over news that the Society of St.

Well, that unrest erupted into a firestorm over the last couple of days thanks to a video that has surfaced of Fr.

Jcc fitness classes

Kilcawley offering the following advice to those addicted to pornography:. Much has already been written by others about this situation. My purpose here is to provide readers with a response from the Society of St. Pius X. Before we get to that conversation, let me say that I join those who find Fr.

Types of bioassay

For one, while Fr. Surely the SSPX has their own professors of moral theology and priests who are well-versed in providing spiritual direction. In my candid discussion about this, and other troubling aspects of this situation, with James Vogel today, it became apparent that he, and others involved in the planning of the conference, are genuinely convinced that Fr. Kilcawley is uniquely qualified to address the topic at hand for the benefit of those in attendance. Kilcawley obviously does not have, and that is the most valuable thing of all; namely, knowledge of and love for Catholic tradition.

Vogel let me know that he is aware of these concerns and others that are being expressed by so many. He did make it known, however, that there will be no changes made to the program in light of the current controversy; i.

Kilcawley will be disinvited or otherwise replaced on the Conference schedule at this late date. Vogel did say that Angelus Press plans on posting the audio of Fr. He went on to say that Angelus Press also hopes to produce a podcast next week that will address this matter further.

This, he stressed, is not something that they required of him alone, rather, it has been a longstanding procedure for all of the conference speakers to submit their transcripts ahead of time. While he was able to express confidence that the talk contains nothing objectionable, I spoke with Mr. I get that, to a point; in fact, I made a similar disclaimer in the first issue of The Catholic Inquisitor.

Parilla dragon

Even so, I discovered after we spoke that the bio provided by Angelus Press informs readers that Fr. Kilcawley is the theological advisor for an outfit called IntegrityRestored.In Kanakapura, a city of 55, in southern India, Catholics have tested the limits of religious freedom: the project to set up a statue of Christ on property that has belonged to the Church for more than a century has been interrupted, on grounds that the hill actually belongs to the Hindu gods!

And yet a Hindu, Doddalahalli Kempegowda Shivakumar, member of the moderate Indian National Congress party, supported the project, honouring the laying of the first stone with his presence on December 25,Christmas Day. But in Karnataka as in many other Indian states, the nationalist Bharativa Janata Party BJP holds power, with a simple but effective line: eradicate Christian presence in the region, in order to restore the Hindu religion in its original purity. Thus the work was soon halted by militia.

In vain, it would appear, since on January 8, daily The News Minute reported that the government of Karnataka had found numerous irregularities in the plans, which are now cancelled. Block cookies Allow cookies.This just in from our friends at the Society of St. Pius X :. Pius X beforeneither were the marriages celebrated without the official delegation of the local bishop or parish pastor.

From the beginning, the authorities of the Society have unceasingly protested to the Roman authorities against the unjust, scandalous declarations of nullity pronounced almost automatically by ecclesiastical tribunals just because canonical form was not observed. By this gesture of the Supreme Pontiff, an important change is effected: from now on the official clergy will be obliged to recognize the ability of the priests of the Society of Saint Pius X to be authorized witnesses of the Church, and marriages can no longer be declared null without a canonical process in the correct and due form.

Bishop Bernard Fellay, the Superior General, also informed the superiors and the other members of the Society that guidelines would be established for the prudent application of these new provisions.

The District Superior, Father Christian Bouchacourt, has relieved these signatories from their function as deans. He condemns this subversive act, prepared in secret, aimed to destabilize superiors and taking the faithful hostage. Pius X.

Behind the Bishop: The Anti-Semitism of the SSPX

We pray for a peaceful resolution:. Explicitly approved by the Pope who ordered its publication, this document intends to regulate marriages celebrated within the framework of Catholic Tradition. Following this letter, a vast communication campaign emanating from very different quarters would like to make us believe that, by this gesture, the Pope purely and simply recognizes the marriages which we celebrate, and even that he recognizes the validity of all the marriages which we have celebrated to date.

The reality is, alas, very different. Since this matter intimately affects you, since it concerns your family, your children who are of an age to get married, and your future, we are duty-bound to enlighten you both on the true significance of this Roman document as well as our attitude towards it.

The obvious validity of our marriages As you know, for forty years now, the Roman authorities have been refusing to recognize the validity of the marriages which we celebrate, and this despite the Law of the Church. Certainly, this Law envisages that the Sacrament of Matrimony be celebrated in the presence of the Parish Priest or his delegate, as well as before at least two witnesses [1].

This is what is called the canonical form of marriage, necessary for its validity. However, since the priests of the Society of Saint Pius X are neither Parish Priests nor delegated by them, certain people maintain that the marriages they celebrate are invalid, due to lack of canonical form.

This is the motive for which both Roman and diocesan tribunals do not hesitate to declare these marriages invalid. However, in doing so, they oppose the most fundamental Law of the Church [2]. If such a situation were foreseen to last thirty days, in this case Ecclesiastical Law recognizes the right of the future spouses to validly and licitly exchange their consent before lay witnesses alone; therefore without either the Parish Priest or a priest delegated by him.

However, for the act to be licit, these future spouses must call on any other available priest, if this is possible. A marriage thus celebrated is done so according to what is called the extraordinary form. It is under this form that we have been both validly and licitly receiving the exchange of your marriage vows for the past forty years, without there being any possibility of doubt.

The State of Necessity Because, as you know, there can, alas, be no doubt concerning the extraordinarily dramatic situation through which the Church is currently passing [4]. In effect, we see Church authorities, from the See of Peter right down to the Parish Priest, undermining the Catholic Faith via a deviant humanism which, placing the cult of conscience at the pinacle, dethrones Our Lord Jesus Christ.

Thus, the Kingship of Christ over human societies is simply unknown, or even combatted, and the Church is gripped by that liberal spirit which especially manifests itself in Religious Liberty, Ecumenism and Collegiality. Through this spirit, it is the very nature of the Redemption carried out by Our Lord Jesus Christ which is called into question, it is the Catholic Church, unique Ark of Salvation, which is de facto denied.

This dramatic attitude of the Ecclesiastical authorities brings about a real state of necessity for the faithful. As long as this ambivalence of the Ecclesiastical authorities has not been dissipated, the great inconvenience foreseen by Canon will equally persist, and the celebration of marriages according to the extraordinary form will therefore be justified. Furthermore, since Matrimony like all the sacraments implies a profession of Faith, we cannot go against the right which the faithful have to the sacraments by imposing on them a minister who habitually carries out his ministry in the adulterous direction officialised at Vatican II, while they have the possibility of referring to a priest who is unscathed by this prevarication in the Faith.

The significance of the Roman document The true significance of the Roman document appears in light of these principles. Persisting in the disastrous line of Vatican II, the Roman authorities simply intend to deprive you of the extraordinary form of marriage by denying the state of necessity.

sspx controversy

Therefore, this document wants to oblige you to have recourse for your marriage to a diocesan priest, only leaving the priests of the SSPX with the possibility of celebrating the Mass which follows the ceremony.


thoughts on “Sspx controversy”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *